In Arthur Miller’s play All My Sons many characters face situations where their response will either benefit their family or it will benefit society. These are very real and difficult circumstances and often there is no in between, a decision must be made. The most important decision made by a character in the play was Joe’s decision to ship out faulty parts. He had to either accuse an innocent man or risk the ruin of his entire company. It was either the lives the men in the planes or the life he had planned for Chris. His son eventually finds out and demands to know what happened screaming, “I want to know what you did, now what did you do? You had a hundred and twenty cracked engine-heads, now what did you do?” (69). Joe decided to save his company and blame Steve for what happened. He killed 21 pilots and those 21 families had to mourn the loss of their sons. He wanted a good life for Chris, he did it all for his son. Not only that but he ruined the life of another man stuck in jail and affected that entire family. Kate also faces a decision to make either for society or for her family. She refuses to believe that Larry is dead so she spends the majority of the play fighting for his life. At the end of another argument about his death she insists, “He’s not dead, so there’s no argument!” (32). She goes against the sane believe of society that he his dead and causes much commotion with her different view. She desperately tries to convince them that Larry is not gone and the family will be whole one day and it masks the possibility of Joe being responsible for Larry’s death. Annie returns home for the first time in three and half years after being invited by Chris. It becomes apparent that they intend on being married. Ann is not necessarily welcomed by the neighborhood and Sue remarks when meeting Ann,
“…it’s very unusual to me, marrying the brother of your sweetheart” (43). Ann is faced the decision of being with the one she loves or go with what society wants her to do. The neighborhood does not relish the idea of having her back and many arguments could have been avoided and awkwardness spared if she left. Either she could come back to a neighborhood that does not necessarily want her, or, even if it does not relate to her own family, she can stay and create a new family with the person she loves. Throughout the play these decisions and made and the results are seen but the argument on who is right is still out there.
I believe that there is a point where one must stick up for their family because they are the closest and most important thing you will ever have. At the same time I think there is a thin line on some situations as to what is right and saveing the lives of many seems the right thing to do. In Keller’s case I think what he did was wrong. He put another family through very hard situations that they shouldn’t have had to deal with and Steve himself got falsely put in prison and withers away. He also lies to his son, which is who he claims he did it all for. On top of all that he put many other pilots in danger, knowingly, which seems surprising after going through losing his own son to the same war. I think there are so many variables in a circumstance like that, for example, Chris could have died in war, or maybe the company would not have completely died if they had just told the truth, that his decision was not rational.In Kate’s case I think she did what came naturally to her as a mother, protect her son from knowing the truth, and refusing that a member of the family was gone. I think she had the right to her beliefs but after 3 years she should have started to see where the rest of the world was coming from. As for Ann she did the right thing by being where with who she loved. She wasn’t harming anyone else, just because people didn’t like her it shouldn’t have affected her decision, and she didn’t know better than to believe Chris over George. Nothing is ever guaranteed, anything can go wrong because of the variables in an given situation and I think that’s what makes these decisions so difficult. Many people have said that they would decide society if it saved more people. I totally understand where they are coming from and won't understand a parent's love until I am one. At the same time if I ever had to decide between say my brother and the lives of people I don't know I dont think I could live with myself if I let my brother die. It scary to even think about being faced with something like that.
Miller, Arthur. All My Sons. New York: Penguin Group, 1947.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
I agree with you completely. Joe was faced with a hard decision, but I believe that he made the wrong decision. On one had it was just his sons future, and the other it was many mens lives. In addition I also agree with the fact that if I let my sister die I wouldn't be able to live with myself. I really liked how you showed both sides to the two decisions Joe could have made. I know every one will agree that they hope they never have to make a terrible decision like this in their lives.
I also agree with the points you made. I definitely think Joe made the wrong decision. Also, I like that you have a strong opinion on this issue, yourself, and believe that family should be valued over society most of the time. Lots of the other blogs (including my own) consider both sides, but it's interesting to read one that is concrete.
Post a Comment